RE100 Progress and Insights Report, January 2018

APPROACHING A TIPPING POINT: how corporate users are redefining global electricity markets

SIGNIFICANT RE100 GROWTH

– 122leadingcompanieshavecommittedtosourcing 100% renewable electricity.

– Their collective electricity demand is over 159 terawatt hours per year (TWh/yr) – this is more than enough to power Malaysia, New York State or Poland, and is a 49% increase on last year’s membership.

– If RE100 were a country, it would be 24th biggest in the world in terms of electricity use1.

– Suppliersandpeersarebeingincreasinglyinfluenced by members.

RE100 MEMBERS ARE ADDING RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY CAPACITY TO THE GRID

– 25companiesachievedtheir100%targetbytheend of 2016.

– On average, RE100 members are sourcing 32% of their electricity from renewables.

DIRECT INTERVENTION AND DIVERSIFICATION OF ENERGY MARKETS

  • –  Renewablepowerconsumptionfromcompaniesgrew, with the proportion of procurement from offsite grid-connected generators (Power purchase agreements – PPAs) increasing more than fourfold in one year, from 3% to 13%.
  • –  Purchase from on-site installations owned by a supplier has increased x15.
  • –  56 companies generated some of their own electricity on site in 2016, increasing generation ninefold on the previous year.

BETTER COST COMPETITIVENESS OF RENEWABLES IMPROVING THE BUSINESS CASE

– 88%ofrespondingmemberscitetheeconomiccase as an important driver for their RE100 commitment.

– 30 out of 74 respondents reported that switching to renewable electricity was cost competitive or resulted in cost savings on their energy bills.

Click here for the complete REPORT

Posted in Climate Change, Solar, Solar PV | Leave a comment

Global Market Outlook For Solar Power / 2017 – 2021

FOREWORD

Welcome to SolarPower Europe’s Global Market Outlook 2017 – 2021. This Global Market Outlook is special for various reasons: in response to the rapid developments in the solar sector it contains much more information than last year’s edition. It was also fully produced in-house by our newly established market intelligence team, who will develop more reports going forward. This year we begin a cooperation with the Global Solar Council for this report, and our sister organisation, the China Photovoltaic Industry Association, has contributed a chapter of the world’s largest solar market – China.

never before have we seen more solar power being installed in a single year than in 2016. The global solar PV market grew much more than expected – by 50% to 76.6 GW year-on-year. For the first time, solar le behind its renewable energy peer, wind, in terms of annual installations. Together with wind, solar contributed over three quarters of power capacity installations in the European Union last year. All renewables added more than half of new global power generation capacities for the second year in a row.

When looking at cost, solar continues to expands its leadership role. In 2016, another world-record low solar power supply contract was awarded in the United Arab Emirates for 24.2 USD/MW (or 2.4 US cents/kWh). Today, utility-scale solar is generally already cheaper than new combined cycle gas turbines, coal and nuclear power plants, while roo op solar is usually cheaper than grid-power as long as this is not subsidised.

Solar power has also become a job machine in countries that have embraced the technology. In the US, which doubled annual PV installations last year, one in 50 new jobs in 2016 was created in the solar sector.

While all these solar growth numbers sound very impressive, the fact is that solar still has a long way to go to fully tap its potential. The 306.5 GW of grid-connected PV capacity installed end of 2016 generated around 2% of the world’s electricity demand. From today’s perspective, we expect total global installed PV capacity to exceed 400 GW in 2018, 500 GW in 2019, 600 GW in 2020 and 700 GW in 2021. If policy makers get things right by addressing the needs for a smooth energy transition, such as through establishing the right governance, market design and renewable energy frameworks, solar demand could increase much faster, and touch nearly 1 TW of total generation capacity in 2021.

The energy transition towards renewables doesn’t have to be costly today. While about 8% renewables generation capacity was added last year (which is obviously too low), investment dropped by 23%, according to the recent United nations Environment Programme (UnEP) “More Bang for the Buck” report. That means, solar and renewables are doing the right thing – companies are quickly reducing cost for their products. A “de-investment” in renewables is, however, the wrong message to potential investors. With the 1.5°C Paris goal requiring gigantic efforts, it needs much more money to be directed into renewables. China is clearly showing the way – by more than doubling its solar capacity additions in 2016, reaching an annual global market share of over 45%.

Indeed, there are several obstacles that need to be overcome for solar to be able to move into the fast lane. That’s why SolarPower Europe has looked at challenges and solutions for 10 Topics & Trends that will be key for a rapid expansion of solar in the coming years. A large part of this chapter’s content has come from our Task Forces, where we work with our members on business models and policy recommendations in the fields of Trade, Storage, Digitalisation, Tenders, O&M, and Corporate Sourcing.

Enjoy reading our Global Market Outlook 2017 – 2021.

Click here for the REPORT

Posted in Solar PV | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Global Market Outlook For Solar Power / 2017 – 2021

Welcome to SolarPower Europe’s Global Market Outlook 2017 – 2021. This Global Market Outlook is special for various reasons: in response to the rapid developments in the solar sector it contains much more information than last year’s edition. It was also fully produced in-house by our newly established market intelligence team, who will develop more reports going forward. This year we begin a cooperation with the Global Solar Council for this report, and our sister organisation, the China Photovoltaic Industry Association, has contributed a chapter of the world’s largest solar market – China.

never before have we seen more solar power being installed in a single year than in 2016. The global solar PV market grew much more than expected – by 50% to 76.6 GW year-on-year. For the first time, solar le behind its renewable energy peer, wind, in terms of annual installations. Together with wind, solar contributed over three quarters of power capacity installations in the European Union last year. All renewables added more than half of new global power generation capacities for the second year in a row.

When looking at cost, solar continues to expands its leadership role. In 2016, another world-record low solar power supply contract was awarded in the United Arab Emirates for 24.2 USD/MW (or 2.4 US cents/kWh). Today, utility-scale solar is generally already cheaper than new combined cycle gas turbines, coal and nuclear power plants, while roo op solar is usually cheaper than grid-power as long as this is not subsidised.

Solar power has also become a job machine in countries that have embraced the technology. In the US, which doubled annual PV installations last year, one in 50 new jobs in 2016 was created in the solar sector.

While all these solar growth numbers sound very impressive, the fact is that solar still has a long way to go to fully tap its potential. The 306.5 GW of grid-connected PV capacity installed end of 2016 generated around 2% of the world’s electricity demand. From today’s perspective, we expect total global installed PV capacity to exceed 400 GW in 2018, 500 GW in 2019, 600 GW in 2020 and 700 GW in 2021. If policy makers get things right by addressing the needs for a smooth energy transition, such as through establishing the right governance, market design and renewable energy frameworks, solar demand could increase much faster, and touch nearly 1 TW of total generation capacity in 2021.

The energy transition towards renewables doesn’t have to be costly today. While about 8% renewables generation capacity was added last year (which is obviously too low), investment dropped by 23%, according to the recent United nations Environment Programme (UnEP) “More Bang for the Buck” report. That means, solar and renewables are doing the right thing – companies are quickly reducing cost for their products. A “de-investment” in renewables is, however, the wrong message to potential investors. With the 1.5°C Paris goal requiring gigantic efforts, it needs much more money to be directed into renewables. China is clearly showing the way – by more than doubling its solar capacity additions in 2016, reaching an annual global market share of over 45%.

Indeed, there are several obstacles that need to be overcome for solar to be able to move into the fast lane. That’s why SolarPower Europe has looked at challenges and solutions for 10 Topics & Trends that will be key for a rapid expansion of solar in the coming years. A large part of this chapter’s content has come from our Task Forces, where we work with our members on business models and policy recommendations in the fields of Trade, Storage, Digitalisation, Tenders, O&M, and Corporate Sourcing.

Click here for the report 2017 global solar report

Posted in Climate Change, India, Renewables, Residential, Rooftop, Rural Lighting, Solar, Solar Parks, Solar Pumps, Solar Thermal | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Directorate General Recommends 70% Provisional Safeguard Duty on Imported Solar Cells

In a preliminary finding, the Directorate General of Safeguards Customs and Central Excise has recommended a 70 percent safeguard duty on solar cells imported from China and Malaysia for a period of 200 days.

The recommendation comes in the heels of a petition filed by the Indian Solar Manufacturers Association (ISMA). A public hearing will be held before making a making a final determination in the matter.

The petition was initially filed on December 5, 2017 by ISMA on behalf of domestic manufacturers including Mundra Solar PV Limited, Indosolar Limited, Jupiter Solar Power Limited, Websol Energy Systems Limited, and Helios Photo Voltaic Limited. The companies claimed that they collectively manufacture more than 50 percent of all solar cells manufactured in India. The applicants had requested immediate application of a safeguard duty for four years.

The preliminary finding is based on the data submitted by the domestic manufacturers and would be subject to further scrutiny.

The Directorate General of Safeguards noted that even though the petitioners had requested the imposition of safeguard duty on China, Taiwan, Malaysia and Singapore, other than China and Malaysia, the solar cell imports did not exceed 3% individually and 9% collectively. Hence, the DGAD’s provisional safeguard recommendation is restricted to only Chinese and Malaysian cell manufacturers.

In the report, the Directorate General mentioned that the petitioners include Special Economic Zones (SEZ) units who qualify to be treated as a domestic industry. But according to the SEZ Act 2005, Section 30, any goods movement from an SEZ unit into the domestic tariff area is open to duties of customs including a safeguard duty, where applicable. So any product sold by an SEZ unit into the domestic market will attract the same safeguard duty as the imports from China and Malaysia. To put it simply, the petitioners who operate in SEZs would not only lose the protection of the safeguard measure, but they would themselves be subject to the safeguard duty. In which case there would be zero benefit for petitioners from SEZ, while the entire industry would be upended.

Speaking to Mercom, an official at the office of Directorate General said, “Even if these petitioners are in SEZ, they are producing in India and then exporting it elsewhere. They function in the country and follow the laws just like any other domestic manufacturer. The only difference is that they have some relaxations as they are in SEZ, but that doesn’t mean their petition won’t be considered. They are a part of the domestic manufacturing diaspora.”

A large domestic manufacturer told Mercom: “I do not understand this petition. First, there are regulations that the manufacturing units in SEZs won’t be counted as part of the domestic manufacturing capacity. Now, the petitioners are in SEZs. If a safeguard duty is imposed, they will also have to pay. Or the laws and regulations governing SEZs need to be changed to accommodate these companies not paying the duty. This petition is like these people are putting their own feet on the axe.”

We were not able to get a response by any petitioners when we contacted for comments.

As we have reported before, most manufacturers do not want anti-dumping imposed on foreign made cells as the domestic cell manufacturing capacity is not enough to replace imports. This petition adds to the uncertainty in the sector where project development risk is increasing with new challenges popping up every day.

ISMA has already filed an anti-dumping petition in June with the Ministry of Trade and Commerce, against solar modules and cells from China, Taiwan and Malaysia.

Source: Mercom

Posted in Cells & Modules, Government, PV, Renewables, Solar, Solar Parks, Solar PV | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Government unlikely to scrap customs duty on import of solar panels

Plea by MNRE secretary to give duty relief to solar power developers turned down at a meeting of government stakeholders.

BENGALURU: The government appears to have turned down a plea by the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) to scrap import duty on solar panels imposed last year, according to the minutes of a meeting held earlier this month.

The renewable energy ministry had backed the demand by solar developers that such equipment should continue to be exempted from duty.

This would mean developers getting equipment from overseas having to pay levies that add up to about 10%, possibly reversing the decline in solar tariffs in successive auctions in the past three years unless power producers choose to absorb the extra cost, experts said. However, developers that quoted tariffs based on a zero-duty calculation in past auctions may get some relief.

The minutes of the December 6 meeting held by finance secretary Hasmukh Adhia and attended by government stakeholders indicate that the change will stay in force and developers will lose the concession that’s been in place since India’s solar programme began in 2010.

Government unlikely to scrap customs duty on import of solar panels

ET has seen a copy of the minutes, signed by Zubair Riaz Kamili, director, customs.

“Policy intervention in the form of customs duty exemption may not always be the ideal way to promote growth of solar power generating industry in the country, particularly when the import is also being investigated by DGAD (Directorate General of Anti-Dumping) for possible dumping, besides safeguard protection,” finance secretary Adhia is cited as saying in the minutes.

He agreed however that developers that had already quoted tariffs and won projects expecting customs duty to be nil should be protected, and asked the MNRE to give him a list of such developers and projects. This was in response to MNRE secretary Anand Kumar saying that the imposition of customs duty “will cause distress to importers who have already bid for solar power projects and quoted power tariffs,” according to the minutes.

The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) ended its longstanding policy of exempting imported solar panels and modules from customs duty last year, imposing a levy of 7.5%, along with various cesses, adding up to about 10%. More than 90% of solar panels and modules used in Indian solar projects are imported, mainly from China, Malaysia and Taiwan.

A CBEC notification in September last year said solar panels and modules should not be classified along with diodes, semiconductors and related electronic equipment (under customs code 8541) but with electrical motors and generators (customs code 8501), which attract 7.5% basic customs duty plus cesses. This doesn’t appear to have been implemented however for a year and solar equipment importers weren’t aware of the change.

Implementation began only in September this year, initially at Chennai port and later at other ports as well. MNRE secretary Kumar argued at the December 6 meeting that this would raise solar tariffs and adversely impact the country’s ambitious solar programme, according to the minutes.

The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) backed the revision, maintaining it would help local solar manufacturers compete with global ones and was thereby in keeping with the Prime Minister’s Make in India policy. Imports are around 25-30% cheaper than locally made solar equipment mainly due to economies of scale and hidden government subsidies.

Developers had initially resisted paying the duty at Chennai, leading to equipment piling up at the port. They have since begun paying and clearing goods for fear of missing project deadlines.

In November, MNRE minister RK Singh wrote to finance minister Arun Jaitley that solar modules had been exempted because they tapped renewable energy. MNRE secretary Kumar made the same argument to CBEC board members.

Solar developer Acme Solar, among the worst affected, has moved the Madras High Court against the new classification. At the December 6 meeting, the customs representative said the new classification was based on “Harmonised System of Nomenclature followed all over the world for the classification of goods” and argued that any exception for solar panels and modules should be spelt out clearly in the rules, according to the minutes.

The DIPP secretary “emphasised the cause of Make in India and stated there was a need to promote manufacturing of solar panels and modules in India, and that the domestic industry needed protection of at least 30% so as to have a level playing field vis-a-vis imports.”

The commerce ministry representative noted that, on the basis of complaints made by local manufacturers, DGAD had initiated “anti-dumping investigation into the import of solar panels and modules from China, Malaysia and Taiwan.”

The DG Safeguards said his office had received a representation from local manufacturers to impose safeguard duty on imported solar goods.

Source : ET

Posted in Anti Dumping Duty, Anti-Dumping, Cells & Modules, India, PV, Renewables, SECI, Solar, Solar PV, tax exemption | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

UPERC Adopts Renegotiated Tariff of ₹7.02 for Solar Projects Tendered in 2015-16

The Uttar Pradesh Renewable Energy Commission (UPERC) has adopted a renegotiated tariff of ₹7.02 (~$0.11)/kWh as the new tariff for solar projects tendered in financial year 2015-16. This is negatively affecting 215 MW of grid-connected solar projects and hampering the growth of solar in the state.

UPERC was overseeing the tariff renegotiation in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Replying to a petition by Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (UPPCL) and Uttar Pradesh New and Renewable Energy Development Agency (UPNEDA), UPERC stated, “The Commission adopts a tariff of ₹7.02 (~$0.11)/kWh for the developers whose projects are complete.”

The tariff of ₹7.02 (~$0.11)/kWh will be applicable for a period of 12 years after which the developer will supply power to UPPCL at the average pooled power cost (APPC), which cannot be more than ₹7.02 (~$0.11)/kWh, stated an official at UPERC.

In all, 215 MW of grid-connected solar projects will be affected by this renegotiation. Out of the 215 MW, grid-connected solar projects totaling 135 MW have been commissioned.

Out of the nine companies that have commissioned projects, six are not ready to sell power at the renegotiated tariff. The UPERC order has paved the way to sign PPAs for 60MW of grid-connected solar projects out of a total auctioned capacity of 215 MW.

Six other developers that have yet to commission their projects are in danger of losing out on a PPA. The UPPCL has asked the UPERC if it wants to terminate the PPAs for these projects due to delays in project commissioning. The UPERC is yet to decide the fate of these projects, which total 80 MW.

According to Mercom’s India Solar Project Tracker, the current installed capacity of grid-connected solar in Uttar Pradesh is over 600 MW. The capacity addition has been very slow and if conditions like these persist, the state will have to outsource its solar power needs. But even that would be troublesome as few developers would be interested in selling power to a state with a history of reneging on contracts.

The Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) had tendered a total of 750 MW of solar at the Bhadla Solar Park in Rajasthan to supply power to Uttar Pradesh to fulfill demand.

Mercom reported in August 2017 that the National Solar Energy Federation of India (NSEFI) sought an extension of the project commissioning timeline for six solar projects in Uttar Pradesh.

Source: MERCOM

Posted in Government, Renewables, Solar, Uttar Pradesh | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Solar power developers flouting domestic content norms may face penal action

India plans to penalize solar power firms that are using foreign equipment in projects awarded on the basis that they would only use locally made solar panels and cells
As solar panels account for nearly 60% of a solar power plant’s cost, companies have been using Chinese imports to reduce costs.

As solar panels account for nearly 60% of a solar power plant’s cost, companies have been using Chinese imports to reduce costs.

New Delhi: India plans to penalize solar power developers which are using foreign equipment in power generation projects awarded on the basis that they would only use locally made solar cells and modules, according to two government officials.

To curb such malpractices, the government will make it mandatory for developers to publicly disclose the radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag information of the panels used in solar projects. It will also be incumbent on the developers to share the RFID list of rejected panels.

Mint reported on 7 September that poor quality Chinese solar modules, rejected by developers, were being sold in the domestic market at a discount.

These projects, awarded under the so-called domestic content requirement (DCR) route by state-owned firms, are required to use solar cells and modules made in India. Also, under the solar roof-top scheme, the government gives subsidy on the condition that the modules should be made in India wherein solar cells can be imported.

“We are trying to attack that (malpractices). We have seen that under the DCR projects there have been instances wherein Chinese imports have been used,” said a senior government official, one of the two cited above, requesting anonymity.

Solar modules or panels account for nearly 60% of a solar power project’s cost. For China’s solar panel manufacturing capacity, estimated to be around 70 gigawatts (GW) per year, the major markets are the US, India and China itself.

“A case has been brought to our notice wherein a firm has put Chinese component under the DCR programme. We will take action against such cases. We are looking into such practices…We are looking into cases wherever we receive a complaint that under the DCR somebody has used foreign component,” the official added.

Indian companies are aware of the malpractice.

“The entire policy faces a risk when companies start flouting the existing rules which are there to promote domestic manufacturing and local jobs. It’s basically kind of profiteering out of a policy custom made for local jobs and it’s very important that the investigation is carried out in a time-bound manner and suitable action is taken against the people who are doing such activities,” said Ketan Mehta, managing director and chief executive of Rays Power Infra, a solar project developer.

The Indian government introduced stringent quality norms in August for solar equipment to be sold in the country and made the destruction of sub-standard equipment mandatory.

“We are planning that RFID of each module has to be captured and uploaded somewhere so that cross-checking happens. Rejected modules RFID will also be captured,” said another government official who also didn’t want to be identified.

Also, there have been allegations of government subsidy being availed multiple times on the same set of panels at multiple locations.

“Problem is more where it is subsidy related. A case in point being roof-top solar projects where the common man doesn’t know what quality he is getting. All those things have to be captured in RFID,” said the second government official cited above.

Of India’s plan to add 100 gigawatt (GW) of solar power capacity by 2022, 40GW is to come from roof-top projects.

“It can also happen that someone puts a panel on a rooftop and claims subsidy and then removes it and puts it on another rooftop to claim subsidy. There is a possibility of it happening. This kind of thing will prevent it,” added the second official.

Queries emailed to a spokesperson for the new and renewable energy ministry on 16 November remained unanswered.

“Tracking of modules on a central data base not only gives convenience to the buyer that they can check the manufacturing date, name of the module and its quality on a central data base but also it will help government in tracking a single module not being used on two or three places and claims the benefits again and again in terms of subsidy and shift to some other places,” added Mehta of Rays Power Infra.

With the average efficiency of a solar panel usually just 16-22%, sub-standard quality will impact generation. India has also been conducting an anti-dumping investigation on solar equipment from China, Taiwan and Malaysia.

Source: LiveMint

Posted in Cells & Modules, Government, India, PV, Renewables, Solar | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
%d bloggers like this: