SoftBank, Actis, and CDC Group Companies Win SECI’s 750 MW Solar Auction

The Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) has auctioned 750 MW of grid-connected solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity to be developed at the Kadapa Solar Park in the state of Andhra Pradesh.

The capacity was tendered by SECI in January 2018 under the NSM Phase-II Batch-IV Tranche-XV.

In the SECI auction, ₹2.70 (~$0.039)/kWh emerged as the lowest (L1) tariff quoted. Both SB Energy and Sprng Soura Kiran Vidyut quoted the L1 tariff in the auction.

SoftBank, Actis and CDC Group Companies Win SECI’s 750 MW Solar Auction

When contacted, a SECI official confirmed the conclusion of financial bidding and said, “SB Energy Seven Private Limited quoted the L1 tariff to develop 250 MW. Sprng Soura Kiran Vidyut (Actis) also quoted a tariff of ₹2.70 (~$0.039)/kWh to develop 250 MW, Ayana Renewables quoted a tariff of ₹2.71 (~$0.0394)/kWh to develop 250 MW.”

ACME Solar and Fortum were the other bidders participating in the financial bidding. ACME quoted a tariff of ₹2.71 (~$0.0394)/kWh and Fortum quoted a tariff of ₹2.79 (~$0.040)/kWh to develop 250 MW each but could not win the auction.

SoftBank, Actis and CDC Group Companies Win SECI’s 750 MW Solar Auction

The L1 tariff quoted in this auction is ₹0.26 (~$0.003)/kWh, more than the recently quoted low tariff of ₹2.44 (~$0.035)/kWh in SECI’s recently concluded 2 GW solar PV auction.

Source: Mercom

Posted in Andhra Pradesh, Crystalline, Grid Connected, India, Power Generation, PV, Renewables, Solar | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Impose 95 per cent safeguard duty on solar cells import: ISMA

Impose 95 per cent safeguard duty on solar cells import: ISMANew Delhi: Indian Solar Manufacturers Association (ISMA) has demanded imposition of 95 per cent safeguard duty on imports of solar cells and modules to protect domestic players from cheap inbound shipments.

The association put its demand during a public hearing called by the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR), under the commerce ministry, on the issue on Tuesday. The directorate heard different sections of solar energy sector on safeguard duty investigation of solar cells.

“According to the ISMA data submitted to the DGTR, the injury from solar imports is to the tune of 95 per cent and therefore ISMA sought the proportionate safeguard duty on the solar equipment imports,” ISMA Coordinator Dhruv Sharma said.

Sharma expressed hope that a decision would be taken by the authority by the middle of next month. The parties will submit their written submission tomorrow on which rebuttal can be submitted by July 2. Thus, a decision can be expected by middle of July.

However, according to Solar Power Developer Association, the imposition of safeguard duty can jeopardise India’s ambitious target of having 100 GW by 2022 as it would directly impact 25 GW capacity which either tendered or being tendered.

The ISMA in its submission has stated that India is missing out on a multi-billion opportunity for the country by allowing import of inputs from countries such as China, Taiwan and Malaysia.

“India is estimated to add capacity of 9,000 MW solar power in 2018. This means India will give away market opportunity worth Rs 21,500 crore to China, Taiwan or Malaysia at the cost of interests and employment of national capital and labour,” it said.

India is targeting 100 gigawatt (GW) solar capacity by 2022. Solar cells are electrical devices that convert sunlight directly into electricity, are imported primarily from China, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan.

Imports of the cells from these countries account for more than 90 per cent of the total inbound shipments in the country.

Source: ET

Posted in Anti Dumping Duty, Cells & Modules, Crystalline, Government, Policy, PV, Renewables, Solar Policy, Solar PV | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Draft Amendments to Tariff Policy as of 30th May 2018

Proposed_amendments_in_Tariff_Policy

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Draft Amendments to Tariff Policy

MINISTRY OF POWER RESOLUTION
New Delhi, the 28thJanuary, 2016

TARIFF POLICY

As on 30.05.2018

  1. 1.1.  In compliance with section 3 of the Electricity Act 2003, the Central Government notified the Tariff Policy on 6th January, 2006. Further amendments to the Tariff Policy were notified on 31st March, 2008, 20th January, 2011 and 8th July, 2011. In exercise of powers conferred under section 3(3) of Electricity Act, 2003, the Central Government hereby notifies the revised Tariff Policy to be effective from the date of publication of this resolution in the Gazette of India.Notwithstanding Anything done or any action taken or purported to have been done or taken under the provisions of the Tariff Policy notified on 6th January, 2006 and amendments made thereunder, shall, in so far as it is not inconsistent with this Policy, be deemed to have been done or taken under provisions of this revised policy.
  2. 1.2.  The National Electricity Policy has set the goal of adding new generation capacity and enhancing per capita availability of electricity per year to not only eliminate energy and peaking shortages but to also have a spinning reserve as specified by the Central Electricity Authority. Development of the power sector has also to meet the challenge of providing access for to affordable electricity to all households in next five years.
  3. 1.3.  It is therefore essential to attract adequate investments in the power sector by providing appropriate return on investment as budgetary resources of the Central and State Governments are incapable of providing the requisite funds. It is equally necessary to ensure availability of electricity to different categories of consumers at reasonable rates for achieving the objectives of rapid economic development of the country and improvement in the living standards of the people.
  4. 1.4.  Balancing the requirement of attracting adequate investments to the sector and that of ensuring reasonability of user charges for the consumers is the critical challenge for the regulatory process. Accelerated development of the power sector and its ability to attract necessary investments calls for, inter alia, consistent regulatory approach across the country. Consistency in approach becomes all the more necessary considering the large number of States and the diversities involved.
Posted in DISCOM, Grid Interactive Distributed Solar Energy Systems, India, Madhya Pradesh, New Delhi, Punjab, Rajasthan, Telangana, Uttar Pradesh | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

India won’t levy duty on solar gear imports

Bengaluru: The government has decided not to impose safeguards duty on solar equipment from China and Malaysia, overruling the directorate general of safeguards’ recommendation of a 70% levy that had delighted local manufacturers but alarmed developers who felt that the steep rise in input costs would make projects unviable.

The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition challenging the proposed duty after the government’s counsel said the directorate general of safeguards’ recommendation was not binding. The counsel showed the court confidential minutes of a meeting held by the standing committee on safeguards, which had decided not to impose the duty.

Anand Kumar, secretary, ministry of new and renewable energy, confirmed there would be no provisional safeguard duty. “As of now there will be no duty,” he told ET.

“If it ever comes up in future, we will make sure the interests of all stakeholders are safeguarded,” said Kumar.

In the high court, Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Chander Shekhar did not comment on the merits of the petition by Acme Solar and said it should be treated “as a representation to the respondents before the final decision is taken by the Central government”.

The judges remarked that the minutes of meeting suggested that no imposition of provisional duty was likely, and that if any such step was taken, Acme Solar could approach the court again with a fresh petition. “This order would not foreclose the right of the petitioner to challenge any adverse order in accordance with the law,” the court said.

The development comes as a huge relief to solar developers, since over 90% of the equipment used in Indian solar projects is imported.

Acme Solar, in its petition, had claimed that imposing the duty would increase solar tariffs from around Rs 2.50 per unit at present to around Rs 4.50 per unit, which would render their business unviable.

India’s solar power capacity has expanded rapidly in recent years, led by big investments by companies such as ReNew Power, Tata Power, Hero Future Energies, Greenko, Acme Solar and Azure Power. Relatively cheap imported equipment has helped Indian solar power tariffs plunge to a record at auctions.

The DG of safeguards had made his recommendation following a petition from the Indian Solar Manufacturers Association (ISMA), which claimed to represent local solar manufacturers, maintaining that Chinese and Malaysian solar panels were being priced lower than locally made equipment. Acme Solar’s petition had questioned the legitimacy of ISMA as a voice of local industry, claiming that many of its members had their units in special economic zones.

Earlier Shapoorji Pallonji Infrastructure too had moved the Madras High Court against the DG of safeguards’ proposal, claiming it had not been given enough time to respond during the investigation, but the petition was dismissed.

Safeguard duty — as distinct for anti-dumping duty — can be imposed on a product for a maximum of four years if its import increases unexpectedly to the extent that this causes serious injury to domestic industry. Separately, the director general of anti-dumping and allied services, is also investigating whether anti-dumping duty should be imposed on solar imports.

The manufacturers who filed the petition are Mundra Solar (part of Adani Group), Indosolar, Jupiter Solar Power, Helios Photo Voltaic and Websol Energy Systems.

Other manufacturers, who would have gained if a safeguards duty was imposed, include Vikram Solar, Waree Energies, Tata Power Solar Systems, Emmvee Solar Photovoltaic and Moserbaer Solar.

Source: ET

Posted in Anti Dumping Duty, Anti-Dumping, Cells & Modules, CERC, India, PV, Renewables, Solar, Solar PV | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BESCOM Proposes a Tariff Separation for Open Access Consumers Above 1 MW in Karnataka

Bangalore Electricity Supply Company (BESCOM) has proposed a separate tariff for >1 MW open access consumers, as it causes the non-recovery of fixed costs.

BESCOM has requested for an increase in charges for consumers of 1 MW and above with the goal of recovering fixed charges, as consumers try to find the cheapest variable rate available. Instead of eliminating the open access program, BESCOM has tried to recover more revenue from these consumers.

To calculate this tariff, BESCOM considered the existing approved rates for FY17 open access sales as base data to divide the demand and energy charges. Considering the existing approved rates of fixed and variable cost and based on the actual recovery during FY17, BESCOM says it has recovered only 11 percent of the cost through fixed charges with the remaining 89 percent recovered through variable charges.BESCOM Proposes a Tariff Separation for Open Access Consumers Above 1 MW in KarnatakaTo ensure the recovery of full fixed costs by reducing the energy charge, it is proposing to increase the fixed charges. BESCOM has also proposed to increase the billing demand to 85 percent of the contract demand or the maximum demand recorded, whichever is higher. BESCOM also wants to penalize proportionate consumption consequent to exceeding the contract demand.

Through this proposal, BESCOM is attempting to generate additional revenue from high tension (HT) consumers with contracted demand (CD) of 1 MW and above by encouraging them to consume over and above the average 12 months consumption through a concessional tariff rate. If >1MW consumers are attracted to this scheme, HT sales will go up, which in-turn would help BESCOM achieve its HT sales target approved by the KERC for the year. This is expected to have a positive impact on the cross-subsidy generation, which could then reduce the subsidy burden on state government for the respective year.

BESCOM is proposing having a separate tariff under both the HT and low tension (LT) category with a time of day tariff. Per the prevailing tariff structure, battery charging units are also being billed under a commercial tariff.

BESCOM also noted that the cross-subsidy surcharge calculated by Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) and recovered from open access consumers is often insufficient to recover the entire loss of a cross subsidy.  Renewable purchase obligation (RPO) targets are also fixed to encourage solar energy. As solar generation has increased significantly since last year, BESCOM has a proposed levy of wheeling and cross subsidy surcharge for renewable energy, including solar energy.

Source: Mercom

Posted in Commercial, Grid Connected, India, Karnataka, PV, Renewables, Solar | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Renewable Energy and Jobs Annual Review 2018 – IRENA

Global renewable energy employment reached 10.3 million jobs in 2017, an increase of 5.3% compared with the number reported in the previous year.

An increasing number of countries derive socio-economic benefits from renewable energy, but employment remains highly concentrated in a handful of countries, with China, Brazil, the United States, India, Germany and Japan in the lead.

China alone accounts for 43% of all renewable energy jobs. Its share is particularly high in solar heating and cooling (83%) and in the solar photovoltaic (PV) sector (66%), and less so in wind power (44%).

The PV industry was the largest employer (almost 3.4 million jobs, up 9% from 2016). Expansion took place in China and India, while the United States, Japan and the European Union lost jobs.

Biofuels employment (at close to 2 million jobs) expanded by 12%, as production of ethanol and biodiesel expanded in most of the major producers. Brazil, the United States, the European Union and Southeast Asian countries were among the largest employers.

Employment in wind power (1.1 million jobs) and in solar heating and cooling (807 000 jobs) declined as the pace of new capacity additions slowed.

Large hydropower employed 1.5 million people directly, of whom 63% worked in operation and maintenance. Key job markets were China, India and Brazil, followed by the Russian Federation, Pakistan, Indonesia, Iran and Viet Nam.

Employment remains limited in Africa, but the potential for off-grid jobs is high, particularly as energy access improves and domestic supply chain capacities are developed.

Click here for the report

Posted in Biomass, Power Generation, PV, Renewables, Solar, Solar PV, Waste To Energy, Wind | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Revision in Electricity Tariff with effect from 1 April, 2018 and Implementation thereof.

Comm_Cir Tariff 18-19_302

Revision in Electricity Tariff with effect from 1 April, 2018 and Implementation thereof.

Subject:

Revision in Electricity Tariff with effect from 1 April, 2018 and Implementation thereof.

MAHAVITARAN Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.
(A Govt. of Maharashtra Undertaking) CIN : U40109MH20005SGC153645 PLOT No. G-9, PRAKASHGAD, Prof. ANANT KANEKAR MARG, BANDRA (East), MUMBAI-400051

COMMERCIAL CIRCULAR No. -302

Reference: 1) MERC Tariff Order dt. 0311112016 in the Case No. 48 of2016.2) Commercial Circular No. 275 Dated 18.11.2016.

3) Commercial Circular No. 284 Dated 11.04.2017.

The Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, in exercise of its powers under Sections 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act (EA), 2003, and in pursuance of the MYT Regulations and all other powers enabling it in this behalf, and after taking into consideration MSEDCL’s submissions, the written and oral suggestions and objections received and the responses of MSEDCL, and all other relevant material, has issued Multi Year Tariff Order dated 03 November 2016 in Case No.48 of2016.

Accordingly, the guidelines as under are issued for implementation of the said order of the Commission without prejudice to the rights ofMSEDCL to take any action as provided in the law.

The revised tariffs as per this Order shall be applicable from I April, 2018 onwards till 31st March 2019 .

Where the billing cycle of a consumer is different from the date of applicability of the revised tariffs, the tariffs should be applied for the consumption on a pro rata basis. The bills for the respective periods as per the existing and revised tariffs shall be calculated based on the pro rata consumption (units consumed during the respective periods arrived at on the basis of the average unit consumption per day multiplied by the number of days in the respective periods falling under the billing cycle).

Posted in DISCOM, India, MSEDCL | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment